Thursday, November 19, 2009

Common Mistakes on Article Reviews!!!

So now that you have turned in 4 article reviews and received grades back, we wanted to note some common mistakes that were made that you should be careful for in the next 3 article reviews.

1. Unless they are general acronyms that anyone would know that looks at it, you need to write out acronyms. Only list acronyms when you need to use them again in your article review (AR). Also, make sure you type out the entire term when the acronym first appears in your AR, just like shown here.

2. Make sure you inclue doi or a website that anyone (without passwords) can access. The doi can also be found on the article page after you click on the title from EBSCO. For any articles that do not have a doi (which should be RARE), do a public search on google or google scholar. See APA manual for further details on finding doi.

3. While on the subject of doi's...Look up the proper way to reference the doi! There should be no space between the colon and the first number or letter of the identifier. Also, "doi" should not be capitalized. This is clear in the 6th edition references.

4. In general, pay attention to how to reference proper APA style. You are in a psychology graduate program, so you will need to know how to use APA properly for most (if not all) the papers you write here! It will and should become second nature but until then, triple check that all aspects are correct!
a.) Make sure to FULLY reference every piece...That means the correct initials for the names (if it gives a middle name or initial, it should be referenced with that middle initial)...that means the full title...that means the full and proper journal name...etcetera
b.) Make sure to space the initials properly, there is one space between initials!
c.) The order of the names in the article (believe it or not) IS IMPORTANT. Make sure to keep the correct order of the author names
d.) Make sure to watch the rules for article title and source title capitalization and italicizing. For a journal article, the first word of the article title is the only thing capitalized unless there is a colon, in which the first word after the colon is capitalized as well. The only other exception to this is you would also capitalize a word if it were a proper noun...think of this also like if you would capitalize a word mid-sentence, then you would also capitalize that word in the article title.
For the journal name, all words are capitalized and in italics
e.) the journal volume number is also in italics
f.) you include the issue number (the number in parentheses, which is NOT italicized) ONLY IF the journal paginates by issue. This means that you should do a search for the journal name, if you see that each issue it goes back to page 1, you WOULD include the issue number. An easy way to see this is if you see your page numbers go up above 200-250, it most likely does not paginate by issue and you would NOT include the issue number. However, if your article's pages are lower (1-200) either way you should check to see if the journal paginates by issue!
g.) already mentioned, but worth mentioning again! doi is NOT capitalized in the reference...also, there is NO SPACE between the colon and the identifier.

5. It's worth saying it short and sweet again: REFERENCE CAREFULLY AND FULLY!

6. Express numbers in numerical form when numbers are greater than 10 (e.g., 100, or 11). Express number in words when numbers less than 10 (e.g., nine, or two). Always express numbers in words when it is the first word in the sentence (e.g., One-hundred percent of the class is amazing).

7. APA recommends using 12-point Times New Roman font

8. APA clearly states that all words in a heading 4 or more words should be capitalized (e.g., Population From Which Participants Were Drawn)

9. For population we clearly stated earlier (and it is clear in the example) that you need to include the following information: age, number in study, gender, and ethnicity. This is for both quantitative AND qualitative studies. If some or all the information is not clear or not given, state so IN THE POPULATION SECTION.

10. These are meant to be one full page single spaced. Try to keep it as close to one page as possible, if you go 1/4 page over or under, we may have to take points off.

11. This is an APA style assignment (as is this class...again...until it becomes second nature you need to make sure to do it carefully), therefore, throughout the entire paper you must keep with APA guidelines. This is a lesson in summarizing so you don't have to re-read an entire article, so really quotation should be left out. However, if you DO quote (which, again is better not to) it is important (IMPORTANT) that if you use quotations that you cite properly. Look this up again...but for a random example (Labriola, et al., 2009, p. 234).

12. The relevance section is really for how this article is relevant for YOUR research interests. This section is where you would explain why and how it relates to your interests, not how it is relevant for the population. Also...I hope you realize that it is a waste of your time to read something and then do this AR if you aren't going to use it in the future!

For now, this is all. I know that it is a lot...but most of it has to do with APA style. This is not the only class that it is necessary to have APA style (especially referencing and in-text citing) correct! It will benefit you to learn it and practice it for all of your papers!

Questions? Further Comments?

--Your TAs

6 comments:

J. Rehmel said...

So...I don't know how to start a new topic of discussion or whatever. I know Dr. Kim went through this but I didn't quite get it.

I'm confused about what I'm supposed to be doing with the Dummy Variables. I followed the slides and I got to the point where I'm recoding agegroup into a different variable. But it seems like I'm supposed to be separating the one group, agegroup, into 4 different age groups. So I started transforming 3 into 0, reference group, and so on but that isn't right.

Phil Lowe said...

I found perhaps a couple of discrepancies with the posted comments and APA 6th ed.

1. 4d said "For the journal name, all words are capitalized and in italics".

Do you mean "each of the first letter of each word" for the journal name need to be capitalized and Italicised?

2. Comment #6 is not in agreement with pg. 111 of 6th edition writing manual. The 6th p.111 that it is for numbers "10 and above", and not "greater than 10". Please confirm.

Phil

Phil Lowe said...

The reason most of us going over 1 page because Dr. initially has given a word limit of 500-700 words, but not on page length. This somehow has changed? Below is his original guideline.

Phil


"Article Review Length
Including everything, 500-700 words are fine.
Posted by Sung at 11:03 AM 0 comments "

Grace Liu said...

Hi Phil,

Did you get points off because you went over a page? If this happens, please go to see Dr. Kim and ask him about that. Keeping within a page is recommendation. If you went over a page, as long as it is still within the 700 words limit, I don't think any points should be taken off from your article review. But Dr. Kim is the one who make the final decision on changing grade. It sounds like quite a lot of people are having this problem... I will make sure Dr. Kim will know about that.

Journal Names...
Yes, you have to italicized the entire journal name. For capitalization, the first letter of every word should be capitalized, except "of", "on" and some other prepositions. We just assumed you know we are talking about the first letter of every word not the entire word as you can always check plenty of examples in the APA manual.
So, here are some example:
Journal of Applied Psychology
Monitor on Psychology
For details, please refer to the APA publication manual.

Regarding to numbers, thanks for catching the mistake! So, for numbers that are 10 or greater than 10, express them in numerals. For numbers that are less than 10, express them in words. For details, please refer to 4.31-4.38 of the APA publication manual (6th ed.)

Anonymous said...

To clarify: this post states that when the article does not give all the needed demographical info (i.e., age, gender) to include that fact in the Population section of our AR. But, on one of my article reviews I was told to put this in the Flaws/Limitations section. Am I misunderstanding this post?

Grace Liu said...

Hi hannah,

it's my fault... put the missing information of sample under "population" section. sorry for the confusion.

grace