Thursday, December 10, 2009
Table Note: Double or single spacing
I recommended double-spacing. However, single-space won't get a penalty.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
double spacing note
Should we double space the note or single space the note?
Rebecca Kulzer
Homoscedasticity and the Good Enough Rule
Regarding assumption 5 and homoscedasticity, I think I understand that the rule of thumb is that the assumption is violated when the highest variance is 10 times bigger than the lowest variance, ie. with a ratio of 10:1. However, on the "Assumptions in Regression" handout, the Heteroscedasticity Example does not have a variance 10 times bigger than the lowest varience, but there is heteroscedasticity and assumption 5 is violated. Could you clarify? Thank you!
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Question on titles...
Thanks!!
Monday, December 7, 2009
Another question
Also, in my table I've listed Height^2 as one of the variables...is this ok or should I say "height squared"?
another question
Answers to your questions
1. When reporting desriptive statistics like beta, standard error, etc... in our APA table when the number is 0.001 (for example) would we insert 0.00 or would we include 0.001?
0.00 not 0.001
2. Also, although it doesn't need to be APA, for multicollinearity statistics do you want us to give the specific numbers or just whether the numbers meet the cutoffs?
Copy and paste the table that lists muliticollinearity statistics and state whether they meet the cutoffs.
3. Could someone provide an example of a title for question 1...how do we state correlations between, SD and M without being redundant of info provided in the table?
descriptive statistics (or means, standard deviations) and correlations of study variables (please do not copy and paste this. you need to format it according to the APA styles.)
4. For question 3, do we need to state why we "decided" to use the square method to transform...we were not taught how to decide which to do. Can we just say something to the effect of "the plots show we need to transform____?
Yes. Please read the question carefully. The answer is there. (hint: scatterplot)
5.Do we need to report the exact values for VIF and tolerance when we talk/write about multicollinearity?
Please refer to my answer to Question 3 above.
6. In our write-up for number 6, how do we report transformation? Could we please have an example of that...also, do we need to report anything about cheight, sqheight, or sqCheight anywhere in that write up?
"In the analysis the height variable was centered. Also, a quadratic term of height was created by squaring the centered height variable, which, then, was entered into the regression model."
7.Do we need to paste the bivariate partial plots for number 8? aka the cheight or the sqcheight?
I haven't asked for any partial plots for number 8. Please read on the blog my answers about the assumption checking for Questions 2, 5 and 8.
8.So my understanding is that we only round to 2 decimal places on tables. What do we do with a number like 0.00049? SPSS by default shows 3 decimal places. So that would be shown as 0.005. Rounding to 2 places would make that 0.01. However, looking at the original number, we would get 0.00. These seem like quite different numbers. Do we put a note somewhere in the table?
Please refer to my answer to the number 1 above. Also, look at pp. 113-114 APA manual.
Attach "all printouts"
Questions 2, 5 and 8: relevant plots (assumptions)
Question 3: scatterplots
Qustions 4, 5 and 8: table that shows multicollinearity
Saturday, December 5, 2009
More questions
2. How do we get SPSS to show us the exact result for p...sig?
If we find SEB, etc. values that are .000 or .0002, how do we report them in the table??
3. the * for p values...does it matter if we just hit shift and ** or do we need to make them a superscript...does it matter???
4.I'm lost on what to report in my note for the table for question 7. Do we need to say that height means centered height? Do we need to report the delta R2 if we didn't report them in the table but reported them in our write-up? I was told this was redundancy on my homework #3?
rounding on tables
outliers
Question about final project
2.For question 3, do we need to state why we "decided" to use the square method to transform...we were not taught how to decide which to do. Can we just say something to the effect of "the plots show we need to transform____?
3.Do we need to report the exact values for VIF and tolerance when we talk/write about multicollinearity?
4. In our write-up for number 6, how do we report transformation? Could we please have an example of that...also, do we need to report anything about cheight, sqheight, or sqCheight anywhere in that write up?
5.Do we need to paste the bivariate partial plots for number 8? aka the cheight or the sqcheight?
Friday, December 4, 2009
No Reviews During Finals Week
I just wanted to let you know that there will not be any review sessions during finals week. However, if you have questions feel free to ask here on the blog or email and we will respond on the blog!
--Your TAs
Reporting Descriptive Statistics
Also, although it doesn't need to be APA, for multicollinearity statistics do you want us to give the specific numbers or just whether the numbers meet the cutoffs?
When significance is .001 and we do not know what the numbers mean when we click on them, what should we report p < .001 or p < .01?
Thank you so much!
normality of error plot not required for Question 5
If you have any other questions, please let me know.
Testing Assumption 3 (Correct form of relationship between DV-IVs
APA styles graded
my office hours
I know you have some questions regarding the final project. Please let me know those questions. I will do my best to answer those questions. However, if you think you need my help, please visit me during my office hours. I am going to provide extended office hours next week.
9 am - 11 am, Monday Dec. 4, 2009
9 am - 11 am, Tuesday Dec. 5, 2009
9 am - 11 am, Wednesday Dec. 6, 2009
You can stop by my office during those hours, bu I strongly recommend to schedule a session with me by e-mail before your visiting.
Sung
testing assumptions
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Final Project Question
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
APA Style Resources
I showed a website on APA style at review session today and promised that I will blog it... here it is....
http://www.docstyles.com/apacrib.htm
Also, you can check the Purdue Owl website too! http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
This websites have been updated after the 6th ed. APA publication came out. Hope these will be helpful resources for you. :)
Plots to test assumptions
Assumptions 1 & 2 we don't look at any plots for
Assumption 3: we look at a partial regression plot...is it the same one as for homoscedasicity??
Assumption 4:I have no idea!
Assumption 5: Homoscedasicity...a residual plot...is this the same as a partial regression plot?
Assumption 6: Histogram and Normal p-p plot?
Also, what is a bivariate scatterplot & is this different from a partial regression plot? do we ever use a bivariate scatterplot?
Question about Cook's D chart on project
Is this suppose to happen?
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Regression with a Categorical Independent Variable (UPDATED!!!)
Since I noticed that some of you will have a quiz tomorrow without getting your HW4 back, I would like to provide some feedback which may help your quiz tomorrow.
If you can still remember that you were asked to calculate group mean for different levels (age group) of an independent variable, some of you might have rounded off the unstandardized betas before plugging them into the formula that help you figure out the group mean. I suggest you not to round off unstandardized betas before you plug them into the formula in order to get a more accurate group means. For example, you can see that you got an unstandardized beta (4.5678) on the coefficient table (spss output), plug in 4.5678 instead of 4.57 into the equation to get a more accurate group mean.
Hope this helps!
All the best with the quiz tomorrow or Thursday!! :)
UPDATE-->
I would like to add something too.
For the HW4 question 3 asking you about whether both first session and number of session significantly predict DV or not. You need to look at the significance level in the coefficient table (spss output), but not assessing the significance level by looking at R square only. The significance level is determined by whether the beta of the IV reaches statistical significance or not.
I know this is late at night... I wish I could have put this up earlier.
I'm praying for you guys...
APA stuff
Also, is PTSD known widely enough that I can leave it at that or should I spell it out?? It's part of the title of the journal article.
Monday, November 23, 2009
Homoscedasticity (con't)
Homoscedasticity is tested by a scatter plot of residuals. Residuals are errors, ie. actual score in population - predicted score. The line in the middle of the scatter plot is the mean of Y, ie. the mean of predicted scores.
If you get a rectangular shape of residuals around the line, that means that the residuals are evenly distributed around the mean. This is a good thing. Because homoscedasticity means equal variance of residuals, ie. the variance between the mean of y (the line, or y=0, which means no error) and the errors is homogeneous. So, getting a rectangular shape, which your graph may look like this...
(note: dots are residuals)
You can see that the residuals that is furthest away from the line above and below, from left to right have almost equal distance from the line. This is homoscedasticity.
In contrast, if you get a pattern, such as a "blow horn", which look like this...
You can see how the residuals actually fan out. That is a bad sign! The residuals that are the variance on the left hand side of the graph is small while the variance on the right hand side is huge. The variance of the residuals across the graphs are not homogeneous! So, the blow horn shape definitely violates the assumption of homoscedasticity, because this is heteoskedasticity.
Also, just a reminder, there is rule of tumb for you the check this assumption as well. The assumption is violated when the highest variance is 10 times bigger than the lowest variance, ie. with a ratio of 10:1.
Hope this helps.
Creating dummy variables in SPSS
transform-->
Recode into different variables-->
click over the categorical variable you need to recode-->
create a new name for the recoded variable-->
click change-->
click old and new variables-->
type in the old value (eg. 2)-->
type in the new value (eg. 1)-->
click add-->
repeat as necessary to get all values-->
continue-->
OK
Homoscedasicity
Thanks!
APA Publication manual (first printing)
I would like to let you know that APA is now offering free replacement of the 6th ed. APA publication manual (first printing, which has tons of errors) with its second printing. This offer will end on December 15. So, basically, what you need to do is to call up APA and tell them that you will be sending them your first printing manual, and they will send you back the second printing. For details, please go to the APA publication manual first priting FAQ. (Just in case the hyperlink is not working, here's the url: http://www.apastyle.org/manual/corrections-faqs.aspx) They have to receive your first printing manual by 12/15/09. So, act fast!
Also, I just checked the bookstore today, fyi: they are selling the first printing. The second printing got out in August, so, I guess you may be able to get them somewhere around.
Here's the section from the APA website regarding to the replacement:
I purchased a copy of the first printing of the sixth edition of the Publication Manual from a source other than APA, but I still want a replacement. What do I need to do?
Even though you purchased your first printing of the sixth edition of the Publication Manual from another source, you are still welcome to participate in the return/exchange program. In order to receive an exchange replacement manual, you must return your current copy of the sixth edition to APA no later than December 15, 2009.
We would like to make this transaction as cost neutral to you as possible. A process has been created to provide you with a UPS postage paid return label that you can use to return the book to us. Please call the APA Service Center at 800-374-2721 for more information about the paid return postage process.
If you are interested in an exchange replacement copy, please contact the APA Service Center at your convenience for further information. Service Center staff can be reached at 800-374-2721 from 9:00 am until 6:00 pm (Eastern Time) Monday–Friday. E-mail correspondence can be directed to the Order Department.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
How to make a new post on this blog?
2. Once you accept the invitation and become a contributor, log in on this blog with your user name.
3. Once you logged in, you will find a button says "new post" right next to your email on the top right hand corner of the blog.
Dummy Variables
1. I'm confused about what I'm supposed to be doing with the Dummy Variables. I followed the slides and I got to the point where I'm recoding agegroup into a different variable. But it seems like I'm supposed to be separating the one group, agegroup, into 4 different age groups. So I started transforming 3 into 0, reference group, and so on but that isn't right.
2. Where do I put the c1, c2, c3?
Response:
You're right on transforming! So, you need to recode each age group in order to run the analyzes. It seems like you are lost in the transformation... Let's illustrate the transformation with an example.
Let's say you're running an analysis on how the size of animals (large, medium, and small) predicts their daily diet intake.
So, in your original data set, you have size of animal coded as 1 = small, 2= medium, 3 = large.
Since you can only compare 0 and 1 in categorical regression, unlike gender (male, female), you need to more than one contrast coded predictors. Lecture 12 slide 19 addresses the issue of having multiple levels in one independent variable (IV).
# contrast coding variable = # of levels of the categorical variable examined - 1
In this case, there are 3 levels for size of animal (IV), so, you need 3-1 = 2 contrast coded predictors (aka. independent variables), and I will name the 2 contrast coded predictors as "C1" and "C2".
Let's say I'm going to have "small-sized animal" as the reference group, ie. small = 0, for both C1 and C2.
Then in C1, I will have medium animals as 1, anything not "medium" will be 0.
In C2, I will have large animals as 1, anything not large will be 0.
I will do the following...
So, C1, C2, and C3 are the names for the new predictor variables that will appear on SPSS. You will create C1, C2, and C3 as new variables in SPSS when you're transforming/recoding. Hope this helps.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Common Mistakes on Article Reviews!!!
1. Unless they are general acronyms that anyone would know that looks at it, you need to write out acronyms. Only list acronyms when you need to use them again in your article review (AR). Also, make sure you type out the entire term when the acronym first appears in your AR, just like shown here.
2. Make sure you inclue doi or a website that anyone (without passwords) can access. The doi can also be found on the article page after you click on the title from EBSCO. For any articles that do not have a doi (which should be RARE), do a public search on google or google scholar. See APA manual for further details on finding doi.
3. While on the subject of doi's...Look up the proper way to reference the doi! There should be no space between the colon and the first number or letter of the identifier. Also, "doi" should not be capitalized. This is clear in the 6th edition references.
4. In general, pay attention to how to reference proper APA style. You are in a psychology graduate program, so you will need to know how to use APA properly for most (if not all) the papers you write here! It will and should become second nature but until then, triple check that all aspects are correct!
a.) Make sure to FULLY reference every piece...That means the correct initials for the names (if it gives a middle name or initial, it should be referenced with that middle initial)...that means the full title...that means the full and proper journal name...etcetera
b.) Make sure to space the initials properly, there is one space between initials!
c.) The order of the names in the article (believe it or not) IS IMPORTANT. Make sure to keep the correct order of the author names
d.) Make sure to watch the rules for article title and source title capitalization and italicizing. For a journal article, the first word of the article title is the only thing capitalized unless there is a colon, in which the first word after the colon is capitalized as well. The only other exception to this is you would also capitalize a word if it were a proper noun...think of this also like if you would capitalize a word mid-sentence, then you would also capitalize that word in the article title.
For the journal name, all words are capitalized and in italics
e.) the journal volume number is also in italics
f.) you include the issue number (the number in parentheses, which is NOT italicized) ONLY IF the journal paginates by issue. This means that you should do a search for the journal name, if you see that each issue it goes back to page 1, you WOULD include the issue number. An easy way to see this is if you see your page numbers go up above 200-250, it most likely does not paginate by issue and you would NOT include the issue number. However, if your article's pages are lower (1-200) either way you should check to see if the journal paginates by issue!
g.) already mentioned, but worth mentioning again! doi is NOT capitalized in the reference...also, there is NO SPACE between the colon and the identifier.
5. It's worth saying it short and sweet again: REFERENCE CAREFULLY AND FULLY!
6. Express numbers in numerical form when numbers are greater than 10 (e.g., 100, or 11). Express number in words when numbers less than 10 (e.g., nine, or two). Always express numbers in words when it is the first word in the sentence (e.g., One-hundred percent of the class is amazing).
7. APA recommends using 12-point Times New Roman font
8. APA clearly states that all words in a heading 4 or more words should be capitalized (e.g., Population From Which Participants Were Drawn)
9. For population we clearly stated earlier (and it is clear in the example) that you need to include the following information: age, number in study, gender, and ethnicity. This is for both quantitative AND qualitative studies. If some or all the information is not clear or not given, state so IN THE POPULATION SECTION.
10. These are meant to be one full page single spaced. Try to keep it as close to one page as possible, if you go 1/4 page over or under, we may have to take points off.
11. This is an APA style assignment (as is this class...again...until it becomes second nature you need to make sure to do it carefully), therefore, throughout the entire paper you must keep with APA guidelines. This is a lesson in summarizing so you don't have to re-read an entire article, so really quotation should be left out. However, if you DO quote (which, again is better not to) it is important (IMPORTANT) that if you use quotations that you cite properly. Look this up again...but for a random example (Labriola, et al., 2009, p. 234).
12. The relevance section is really for how this article is relevant for YOUR research interests. This section is where you would explain why and how it relates to your interests, not how it is relevant for the population. Also...I hope you realize that it is a waste of your time to read something and then do this AR if you aren't going to use it in the future!
For now, this is all. I know that it is a lot...but most of it has to do with APA style. This is not the only class that it is necessary to have APA style (especially referencing and in-text citing) correct! It will benefit you to learn it and practice it for all of your papers!
Questions? Further Comments?
--Your TAs
Article Reviews
Also, I need to mention again our class has a late penalty. "If any of the assignments are turned late, ..." Please take a look at the fourth page of our syllabus for more.
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Clarification on variable selection + question (HW4)
Although the instruction states that only first session outcome score and number of sessinos needs to be added, I was thinking perhaps the age group was left out.
2) If a variable is significant (p=.02) but the R2 of the scatterplot is almost close to zero (R2=.006), should the variable be left out of the model since the R2 is weak?
Monday, November 16, 2009
One more question
Thanksgiving week
Sunday, November 15, 2009
ΔR^2
Saturday, November 14, 2009
P values
In our p note (* p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001), if we underline the "less than" signs to indicate "equal to or less than" and then place asterisks accordingly in our Table, will we get points taken off? (I would have underlined here, but don't know how to underline on this blog) - Thanks!
Title for Table
If our title for our table goes beyond one line do we double space the extra lines or single space our title to make it look tighter?
Also, For the different steps, isn't the change in R squared the same for each variable of each step. In other words, wouldn't we have the same number for the variables that fall under each step? If so, should we go ahead and plug the same number in anyway-redundant as it may be?
THank you so much.
Friday, November 13, 2009
More questions! Sorry!
2.If we end up only having either p < .001 and p < .05, do we just use two stars in our note or would we say *p < .05, ***p < .001???
sorry these are so technical, but we're losing points b/c of this stuff and the manual does not give specifics esp. on tables!
Table spacing
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Reporting significance level
According to the APA publication manual page 114, report the exact p value when it is not less than .001.
When the significance level is .05, you will report p = .05.
When the significance level is great than .05, eg. .07, you will report p = .07.
When you are indicating significance level of values in your table, you still use * p < .05, * p <.01, or *** p < .001. You are not going to label any values with an asterisk that has a significance level equal to or greater than .05. Statistics which have significance level that is equal to or greater than .05 is not considered as significant if the model is using an alpha = .05.
Hope this helps!
Question regarding results paragraph
sample write up for HW3
The prediction of college students’ global self worth from school competence, intellectual ability, social acceptance, physical attractiveness, athletic competence, and job competence was explored using a hierarchical multiple regression. The B, SEB, and β for each predictor at each step of the equation are presented in Table 1. The hypothesis that college students’ global self worth would be significantly predicted by school competence and intellectual ability was supported, R2 = .38, F(2, 368) = 113.07, p < .001. Both school competence and intellectual ability significantly predicted global self worth, with higher levels of school competence and intellectual ability associated with higher global self worth. The addition of social acceptance and physical attractiveness to the model significantly improved prediction of
HW 3
my understanding was that the anova table in third block explained the signifcance of the overall model, where as the model summary explains significance within each step. . . .correct?
In our example Dr. Kim gave in class, Confidence intervals are not reported. Do we need to report them in our homework
Christie
Question for HW3
1. If the p value is larger than .05, in the writeup do we just put p > .05? Or do we just state that the model was not significant and not provide any data at all? Basically, what do we do when the model does not change R2 and the pvalue is way to large?
2. If the R2 change equals .002, how do we report that on our table? As .00 or 0 or do we not report it at all?
3. When we are reporting the results in the writeup, for the second and third step do we use change in R2 or just R2?
4. When we are summing up and saying "the overall model," do we look at the Anova table to write up our results (eg The overall model R2 was significantly different than zero, F (7, 887) = 134.56, p < .001) (I changed the numbers) and if so, where do we find F on the anova table
Hierarchical MR write-up question...
I was wondering how to write up the results for the HMR. I was thinking that it would be written this way but please let me know if this is wrong:
- you start with R2 for step 1 and its significance
- then change in R2 for step 2 and its significance
- and then change in R2 for step 3 and its significance
- and, lastly, for the overall model it would be R2 for step 3 and its significance....???
Thanks!
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
For students who were at the Wednesday evening review session
Thanks for coming to the review session tonight. I was just going through the notes and I realized that I made a mistake...
When we were talking about which F ratio and df you are reporting for each step of a hierarchical multiple regression, I told you to report the statistics from ANOVA table. Whoops, I was wrong. You should be reporting statistics under the "change statistics" columns from the "model summary" table. Sorry for teaching you the wrong stuff, I hope it wasn't too late for me to fix it. Please let me know if you need further clarification and elaboration.
I will post the answers for those unanswered questions on the blog once I get a response from Dr. Kim.
Thanks!
Question we asked in class re: the homework
My question was, how do I interpret the data output? How can I tell if there was a significant change in R2?
Basically his response was that if the p value is significant(meaning it is small) you can say that there was a significant change in R2. if the model does not increase R2 by much and the p value is not significant (meaning it is too large), then simply state that the model when such and such variable was added did not significantly explain additional variance- or something to that effect
Hope it was helpful!
Need clarification for using SPSS (HW3)
Or do I run three different process for each predicting hypotheses then insert IV that needs to be provided into the following block?
(e.g. predicting IV from hypotheses 1 -> block 1; IV needed-> block 2; run statistics
predicting IV from hypotheses 2 -> block 1; IV needed -> block 2; run statistics
predicting IV from hypotheses 3 -> block 1; IV needed-> block 2; run statistics)
Monday, November 9, 2009
Homework #2 & Quiz #2
Seong-Hyeon (Sung) Kim
Thursday, November 5, 2009
TA's -
I'm finding it really hard to paraphrase some of these sections.
Homework # 3
I'm looking at my schedule and see that Hmwk #3 is due on Monday (11/9). I think I missed it being passed out - is it available for pick up somewhere? Thank you!
Articles not listed in the faculty recommended readings
Best of luck to you!
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
CI value
Thanks guys!
DOI
Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.naomi.fuller.edu:2048/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2004-16129-004&loginpage=Login.asp&site=ehost-live
that feels like it is too much information, but it links you to the article if you are logged in i believe
christie
t test meaning
Policy on tutoring
You are also encouraged to make a good use of study groups, discussions in class and me.
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
clarification on article reviews
2) Is there supposed to be a period after the DOI number? The examples in the APA book don't seem to have it, but it wasn't explicit so I wanted to make sure.
Thanks!
DOI for article reviews
Monday, November 2, 2009
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Thank you!
I just wanted to say thank you for the bagels the first year class provided for faculty and staff earlier this week. I also wanted to thank you for your attendance and participation at the community meeting. Both the bagels and the engagement were tremendously appreciated.
mlc
Department Chair...and your next quarter stats instructor :)
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Table HELP!
Please read wed night!
thanks!
Nikki
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Confidence Interval (CI)
In order to understand confidence interval, you have to understand standard error first. When you run a simple/linear regression test on SPSS, one of the output table should contains standard error for your regression model. You will also see that the standard error falls under "unstandardized coefficients", which means that it is an unstandardized value.
Standard error (SE) is pretty much a self-explanatory term... obvious, it has something to do with error. Do you still remember the error that we are talking about in research model? So, whenever you have to infer your test analyzes results to the population, you need to count in the error because you're using sample in your research study rather than the whole population. SE is what you want to add or subtract from the predicted score (y variable). As regression is trying to find out whether the x variable predicts the y variable or not, you can try to guess what score you will get for the y variable by providing a score for the x variable. When you want to predict the y variable to the population, you have to add or subtract the SE from the predicted score to a range of score for the possible score of y in the population.
Let's get back to CI, APA publication manual strongly recommends us to report the 95% CI for any inferential statistics. When you say 95%CI, that means you are sure that 95% of the time you predicted score for the y variable falls within the CI. For example, let's say your SE is 1.50, and the predicted y value is 100. For 95%CI, you're sure that 95 out of 100 guesses you will get a score between 98.50 (100-1.50) and 101.5 (100+1.50) for your y variale in the population.
I hope the explanation of CI help you get through the homework.
Good Plagiarism Q
"I am scared to plagarize. there is only so many ways you can say variable 1 and variable 2 are correlated. i dont want to get in trouble for saying something clearly, which happens to be the same way someone else did too. . . tips?"
You just now did a paraphrase Christie! I didn't write anything about correlation on mine. But, if you want more examples, that will come with reading articles. The more you read, the more you'll get the gist of your own style, because you'll have a deeper concept. That's probably the best thing i can tell you. actually, i asked the same thing last year...it's posted a ways down the blog, and Mari gave us good advice::
"I would strongly recommend that you read all the examples ...Read them carefully, understand how they are written, and then put them aside. Write your own write up, and do not consult the examples while you are writing. If necessary, refer back to the examples after you are finished writing to check and see that you included all important information. Don't actually look at the examples while you are writing, though, because that makes not plagiarizing very, very difficult."
Hope that helps!
APA Write ups! (Renewed)
A sample write up (although one I am presently making up as I go) will look as follows:
A linear regression was used to test the hypothesis that time in minutes would predict understanding. The overall model proved significant in that R = .97, F(1, 222) = 579.32, p < .001. As time in minutes increased, understanding also increased (B = 125.23, SEB = 0.25, β = .97, p < .001, 95% CI [123.23, 127.23]).
Until we find otherwise, we are going to report the CI with the coefficients that it relates to (the Betas) and NOT with the R statistics (like in the example given from page 117 of the APA manual), mainly because that is where SPSS is pulling the CI from, so that is how we would report it. PLEASE NOTE! You still need to report the proper statistics from the coefficient table, the 6th edition DID NOT take those away!!! Also...this is not the only way you can write a write up, make sure you are not plagiarizing the examples that any of us have given you! Mainly, just make sure that you include all the necessary elements of the write up and from there the style will come!
Hope this helps! Thanks for your patience as we figured this out!
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Answers for unanswered question from Monday Review Session last week
1. What does F ratio tell you? What does it have to do with regression?
- F ratio tells you how big the explained variance and unexplained variance
- F ratio determines whether your regression model (in the case of regression) is significantly different from the null model (zero) or not
- the significance level tells you whether your regression model is significantly different from zero or not
2. What does d.f.s. mean in lecture 6 powperpoint slide 27?
- d.f.s = degress of freedoms
- referring to slide 26 ANOVA table (SPSS output), df for "total" is equal to the sum of df for "regression" and df for "residual"
3. Do I have to know assumptions of regression now (see lecture 6 powerpoint slide 18)?
- no, don't worry about it if you don't understand it now. Sung will revisit this topic with a lecture later on in the course.
Homework 2 help
To report your model is significant or not (for all kinds of regression):
Significant relationship between number of cars and air pollution index was found, that the number of cars can predict air pollution index, R2 = .88, F(1, 33) = 236.32, p < .001, 95% CI [.02, .22].
To report the direction of your model (for simple regression only):
Increasing the number of cars was related to more severe air pollution, B = 3.87, SEB = 0.25, β = .94, p < .001.
As always, it is worthwhile to look up APA Publication Manual (6th ed.) because it provides critical information on how to do a write-up correctly for your homework. :)
Good luck! ;-)
Friday, October 23, 2009
Need clarification on the assignment
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Monday Review Session Location
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
A word on early Article Reviews
Thanks!
Your TA's
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Single space is recommended.
You can submit your very first article review for a check and get it back with no grade or no penalty, if you want to. However, you need to submit it soon because TAs will be inundated with many article reviews as the first deadline (first 4 article reviews by either Nov. 2nd or 3rd) is approaching. Please note that TAs will be reading about 150 article reviews in early November.
article review questions..again.
Monday, October 19, 2009
Another Article Review Question
"do we have to include a copy of the article with our review? And, how do you tell the difference between an empirical article and the other one"
(a) No, you do not have to include a copy of the article. If we need something, that's what the reference is also used for, you're most likely getting it on EBSCO, so if we need it we will be able to search for it on EBSCO.
(b) My fellow TAs and/or Sung can add to this second part if they think of better clarifications. I think that The best way is to see whether or not there were any tests run. If you see numbers, it is most likely empirical. If you see any statistics, this is most likely empirical. Theory-based articles will just base off of theory, and so when you read through it and write the review you'll use those other headings found on the second page of the example to clarify (i.e., Reference, Major Premise, Development of the Argument, Population From Which the Theory was Developed, Strengths and Limitations of the Paper, Relevance for the Current Question)
Hope this helps...other TAs and Sung may help more.
Article Review
You should follow the 6th edition. I strongly recommend you have a personal copy of the APA Publication Manual (6th ed.). You can buy one at the Fuller Bookstore. Today (Monday) I had a brief review session on article review with the Monday class and am going to have another one with the Tuesday class. If you are familiar with the 5th edition, you need to educate yourself with the difference between the 6th and the 5th editions. Please visit the following website for a brief review on that (Thank you so much, Grace!).
http://www.apastyle.org/manual/whats-new.aspx
If you have any further questions, please let me know.
Sunday, October 18, 2009
So we just put our pseudonym, but then what? For the sample, it has Toaster Strudel, Sandwich, Spaghetti...do we need to type three things there or just our pseudonym?
Also, do we need to inlcude the doi in listing our reference? I have the newest edition of the APA manual, and I'm unclear if I need to provide another number. I've retreived most of my articles from the library's online databases.
Thanks!
Okay I'll admit it...
Article Reviews
Also, at the top of the sample review, it has "toaster Strudel, Sandwich, Spaghetti". What goes there? Is that we're are pseudonyms go?
Thanks!
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Article Review
Let me know if this isn't true, but I think I remember hearing you guys say that you are willing to look at our first Article Reviews to make sure we did them correctly before we turned them in.
Yes? No? Maybe? :)
Thanks for all your help so far!
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
question about review slides
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Review Follow-up
I officially posted the slides I used in the review last night (Monday) onto Portico. Feel free to access them.
HOWEVER please note the disclaimer! These are just a simple review! Although they are taken directly from Sung's lecture notes, they are only supposed to supplement all of his lecture powerpoints! Just because something is included in the review powerpoint does not mean it will definitely be on the test. Also, just because something was excluded from the powerpoint, does not mean it will be excluded from the test. Study wisely!
If you have questions, feel free to blog them or email for us to blog! Also, the Wednesday review session will most likely cover these powerpoint review slides as well for those who missed the Monday review.
Hope it helps!
--TAs
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Boxplot Question
"Can someone tell me how to create the box and whiskers plot."
Do the following...
Graphs --> Legacy Dialogs --> (Boxplot) --> (make sure to select simple boxplot AND "summaries of separate variables") --> (click over desired variable) --> OK
That should do the trick.
Sorry the "summaries of separate variables" was not in the original explanation.
Hope that helps =)
~A TA who is up too late on a Sunday night!
HW #3 Z-score calculation
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Weekly Review Session Time and Venue
Starting from next week, we (TAs) are offering two review sessions every week. Here are the times and venues.
1. Monday 5:30pm (Payton 100)
2. Wednesday 6pm (Psych. Building 120)
We will make these review sessions to quiz review sessions when quiz is around the corner. Otherwise, we will normally just go over some difficult parts of the lecture or answer whatever questions you bring to the review sessions. If you have any questions on your homework, please feel free to blog your questions here, we'll try to get back to you asap. Have a good weekend!
~TAs
Friday, October 9, 2009
Saving Trees
~Andy
Correlation and Covariance
Finding corretation and covariance,
Analyze ---> Correlate--> Bivariate --> Select Variables --> Options --> New Window pops up --> select "cross-product deviations and covariances -->OK -->OK
For the scatter plot,
Graphs --> Legacy Dialogue --> Scatter plot --> select variables to "x-axis" and "y-axis" --> OK
To add line of best fit,
double click on scatter plot on the output window, click the left fifth icon on the bottom tool bar, make sure it's on "linear" mode". The line of best fit should be on the scatter plot after clicking the icon.
Hope this helps!
~ your TAs
Thursday, October 8, 2009
single space recommended
Sung
General question about the homework
Clarifying points
Also, as a follow-up about the article reviews. If you prefer to get our feedback from one before you do them all, feel free to test it out and we'll grade it and get it back so you hopefully won't make the same mistakes on the rest of them. Personally, I highly suggest trying to do one early so that you get the feel for it and also get the rubric down. (And it will take some of the load of the end of your quarter, which i know is quite bulky!)
Hope all is well! Hopefully see you tomorrow (friday) for the spss review!
Article Review
Let me clarify about article reviews. If there is anything confusing, please refer to the sample article review. For example, I am going to explain later in the class, but for now b (analyses listed) & c (findings described) in the syllabus should be combined into b (findings) in the sample. Also, d (sample described) in the syllabus is equal to c (population) of the sample.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Questions about Journal Articles
Thank you for the info about review sessions!
I have a few questions about the journal articles:
1. The sample article review posted on portico appears to be single spaced and is about 1 page in length, but APA formatting is often double spaced and Dr. Kim noted in class the article reviews should be 2 or 3 pages. Could you confirm spacing and length requirements for article reviews?
2. The sample article review posted contains 5 italicized "substantive components" (hypothesis, major findings, population, etc) and the syllabus contains 6 components - the additional one is "analyses listed." Should this analyses section also be included and if so, what info should it contain?
Thank you!
Melissa
Article Review
Here are some tips...
- Dr. Kim has posted an example of article review on portico which you can refer to
- Make sure you include all the headings that are on the example. You can choose to copy the headings from the example (with exact wording, we won't count it as plagiarism). Of course, you're welcome to paraphrase them if you find some better ways to say them.
- Make sure you are following the APA Style Manual in terms of citation and writing style because you will get points off if you did not follow it. For example, never start a sentence with a number (eg. 50), but spell it out (Fifty). Also, make sure you have 1 inch for all margins. You can find APA Style Manual in the Hubbard Library or Integration Library (on reserve) if you don't own one. Here is a helpful website on APA style: http://www.docstyles.com/apacrib.htm
- For any information that the authors should have included in certain sections of the article, make sure you point it out under the section "Flaws of Study and Limitations to Generalizability". For population, you have to include number of participants, gender, enthicity, and age. For example, if the researchers forgot to include the age of participants, make sure you report it.
- Try your best to keep your article review in a page, it's okay if you really need to go over a page
- Make sure you will use quotation marks and include page number(s) if you are quoting something from the article; otherwise, paraphrase everything else.
- Some of you might have learn to put 2 spaces after a period, there is only 1 space between a period and the beginning of a sentence.
- This homework is help you to build up your literature review if you have decided what you want to do for your master/dissertation. If you don't have an area of interest, no worries, you can take this opportunity to explore your interests. So, try to stick with what you are really interested in and demonstrate it under "Relevance for the Current Question"
- In the "reference" section, make sure where to put a space, some periods after authors' initials are followed by a space, some are not. Also, know when to capitalize and when not to, especially for the title of the article.
- You don't need a cover/title page for this homework, use the same layout in the example
- Under "Major Findings" section, you do not need to report descriptive or inferential statistics, rather, you just need to report what kind of test analyzes the researchers used and summarize the findings.
- If you are doing the article review on a qualitative study, follow the headings that are listed on the second page of the example article review posted on portico.
**Review Sessions!!**
So! After great consideration and hearing your response to review sessions, we have decided on a few things.
First of all, we would like to host a SPECIAL review session to intro SPSS and answer any SPSS and/or first homework related questions. This will be THIS Friday, October 9, 2009 at 1:00 pm in the research computer lab in the library. But if you could, come EARLY (5-10 minutes) because the Lab we are in has a login that the tech guy will need to help us with. If you're wondering where the lab is, the front desk should know.
FYI, Grace and I will be using a sample data set that is different from your homework, but are willing to answer any questions regarding the homework and how it works out on SPSS. You will just have to go back and use your own dataset when completing the homework.
Ok, on to the NORMAL/WEEKLY review sessions. We have decided that Monday at 5:30pm (in a location to be announced soon) and Wednesday at 6:00pm (in the psych building room 120) are going to be the normal sessions. I think there are about 4 or 5 of you that this may not work with, and that is fine, if you want a review session FEEL FREE to set one up with one of us, we all enjoy doing this and would be able to better cater to your individual needs.
I hope that this helps out as you expect. If there are any suggestions that any of you may have, feel free to blog it or email one of us for us to blog.
p.s. don't miss the great info about SPSS info in the post just before this one...it gives exact ways to compute with SPSS that will help before the review!
SPSS HELP E-mail
This is coming to you both on the Blog and via e-mail. Future things will all be posted on the blog but until we're all on the blog there will be a few more mass e-mails. Sorry for the inbox clutter.
We are working to put together a review session specifically for SPSS intro on Friday. Location will be the classroom in the library (ask at the library front desk). Time TBA.
We will be focusing on what you need to know to do the homework, class notes will be discussed NEXT week at the normal review sessions. However, we only know SPSS and any questions on how to use "R" need to be directed to Dr. Kim. Please bring your questions to review or post them to the blog if you can. If you can't make the review or aren't able to work the blog yet feel free to e-mail one of us and we'll do everything we can short of doing it for you =). We will be working from an example data set on Friday that does not match the homework assignment.
In case you don't / can't come here's a play by play on how to use SPSS...
The following is taken from Dr. Mari Clements notes with permission...
To obtain estimates of central tendency... ( 3 different ways)
After loading data set into SPSS...
Click on Analyze (one of the options in the top toolbar)
Then select... Descriptive Statistics --> Descriptives --> (click over variables of interest) --> Options --> (check desired stats) --> Continue --> OK
Click on Analyze (one of the options in the top toolbar)
Then select... Descriptive Statistics --> Frequencies --> (click over variables of interest) --> Statistics --> (check desired stats) --> Continue --> OK
Click on Analyze (one of the options in the top toolbar)
Then select... Descriptive Statistics --> Explore --> Dependent List --> (click over variables of interest) --> OK
For Interquartile range: Follow the above directions.
For the graphs/charts you need...
Graphs --> Legacy Dialogs --> (Select desired plots) --> (If necessary, specify type, e.g. simple boxplot) --> (click over desired variable) --> OK
Analyze --> Descriptive Statistics --> Frequencies --> (click over variables of interest) --> Charts --> (check desired stats) --> Continue --> OK
Analyze --> Descriptive Statistics --> Explore --> Dependent List --> (Click over variables of interest) --> Plots --> (Check desired plots) --> Continue --> OK
For Creation of histograms with normal curve imposed:
Analyze --> Descriptive Statistics --> Frequencies --> (click over variables of interest) --> Charts --> Histogram (select "with normal curve") --> continue --> OK
*** you will need to select "simple boxplot" in order to make the required boxplot chart
To make "Z-scores" with SPSS (you can calculate these by hand)
Analyze --> Descriptive statistics --> Descriptives --> (Click over varibles of interest) (select "save standardized values as variables --> OK
We hope that makes sense. Please e-mail or blog any questions. You can also bring your questions to review on friday.
~Your TA's =)
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
We have a blog now.
Sung